Which one of the following is not true regarding the impact of the First World War on India?

By: Prof. Dr. Fazal Rehman Shamil | Last updated: February 3, 2024

 

Question:  Which one of the following is not true regarding the impact of the First World War on India?

A    Defence expenditure resulted in increased taxes.
B    Forced recruitment of soldiers was introduced in the villages
C    Income tax was introduced and customs duties increased
D   The hardships ended with the war as the British introduced the Rowlatt Act

Answer:   The hardships ended with the war as the British introduced the Rowlatt Act

 

Impact of the first world war on India        Description
Economic effects

 

·        Defense expenditure during the war led to increased taxes on the Indian population.

·        Income tax was introduced, and customs duties were raised to generate revenue.

Recruitment and troop contributions·        Forced recruitment of Indian soldiers was introduced, leading to widespread conscription.

·        Over a million Indian troops served overseas, contributing significantly to the war effort.

·        Many soldiers faced harsh conditions and discrimination in the military.

Rise of nationalism·        The war and the sacrifices made by Indians increased nationalistic sentiments.

·        Leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and others used the war’s impact to push for greater self-governance.

Jallianwala bagh massacre·        The repressive Rowlatt Act (1919) imposed by the British government led to widespread protests.

·        In Amritsar, this culminated in the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, where British troops fired on a crowd of unarmed Indian protesters.

Widespread hardships and famine·        The war created extreme economic hardships, leading to food shortages and price inflation.

·        An outbreak of influenza further added to the crisis.

The Rowlatt act and Satyagraha·        The British government passed the infamous Rowlatt Act, giving extensive powers to the police to arrest any person without reason.

·        The Act was meant to curtail the country’s increasing nationalist upsurge.